So I was writing away and noticed that I had thrown a comma in front of "too" in a sentence such as "I'm working on him, too." I looked at it and threw the comma out. It didn't make any sense. There was no pause between "him" and "too", so, rhetorically, the comma wasn't needed (in this case--if one wanted to indicate a pause, then a comma makes a great choice here), and, grammatically, it wasn't doing anything. In terms of meaning, the sentence read just as clearly without the comma. I certainly wouldn't have put in a comma if the sentence read "I'm working on him also" or "I'm working on him as well", so why should it have a comma for "too"? So I went back in the manuscript and made sure to yank all the commas out that I had placed in front of the "too"s where I didn't want to indicate a pause. I must have picked this up from reading and unconsciously noticed that a lot of other writers were chucking commas in front of "too"s, so I started doing it, uh, too. I don't know why those writers were doing that, but often punctuation usage just plays follow the leader even if the trend doesn't make any sense. No doubt that if a copyeditor gets hold of the manuscript, then the too commas will pop back up, and it will be a battle to get them removed, but, in the meantime, they are out.
I hope other writers dump the commas there, too . . . er . . . there too.
Messy breakfast with dogs
-
Supposedly I’m trying to lose weight, but fascism in America depresses me,
and nothing lifts my spirits like sugary sweets. The website for Little
Jaye pro...
20 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment
To reduce spam, I have to approve these. On behalf of the spammers, sorry for the delay!